That's right wh*res, be proud of your whorishness. No one else could come close to topping the skankiness here.

I was going to say that I don't get it...he's not hot AT ALL, however she's proven to be nothing but tasteless trash so they're a perfect match!

On a side note: YES...he's tasteless trash too...takes two to tango!

Two unappealing invididuals having a tawdry relationship -- so what I noticed in the photos was that scarf he's got on. I think I hate it, but for some reason I keep looking at it, and then going back to look again. It's mesmerizingly awful.

Good for them! Trash and dumpsters belong together.

disgusting wh*re bags

Disgusting

@ Mesayme! Girl, your comments always make me bust out laughing. Cheers!

I just found he's in band Ringside. I love some of their songs, but it's so strange to hate Balthazar Getty.

ugh. You know I'm with the wife on this one. He wants the divorce, he better file for it. But really, how do you feel shacking up with a man with another woman's name tattoo over his heart?

That would completely weird me out.

First I would like to thank the author for not glorifying this AFFAIR by calling it a "romance" or using the word "passionate". Secondly, just because he is kissing her or travels to NY/Italy/London to have sex with her, doesn't mean that he is "in love" with her. His wife called his bluff and he has shown the public how much he cares for SM by NOT FILING A DIVORCE/LEGAL SEPARATION.

SM is nothing more than just a "booty-call" and no amount of pictures of her "kissing ANOTHER WOMAN'S HUSBAND on an afternoon stroll" will make anyone think any different. She must think that the judges ruling in her favor was going to make the public "fall in love " with their so-called "love" and make them the next HW "IT COUPLE". She was wrong, because all these pictures show is a woman that is so desperate to keep herself relevant that she would compete with a MARRIED MOTHER OF 4 and her 4 KIDS and sleep with a married man because he has a very famous name/family.

This AFFAIR will last as long as SM continues to financially support the MARRIED MAN and give him "free" sex. It's no coincidence that the MARRIED MAN only resumed "quality time" with SM AFTER she won the settlement money. Take away the "free" sex and money and there will be no more of these staged photo-ops in the rain to convince people that they are "going strong despite all the critisms" (which they both deserve since neither of them have shown RG/her kids any compassion as they continue this VERY PUBLIC AFFAIR).

you have to LOVE these 2 together now...right? they've managed to stick it out through all the rumors and speculation and i hope that we get to see more of them. well. ...i wish that i could see more of them since they were in NYC and i managed to miss them

I don't have a moral judgement but I don't think either of these two are stable. I don't think this will last.

They have no shame . . .he's still married so I don't think many people "LOVE" these 2

Oh, please. Leave them alone.

I think he's gorgeous...you gals are missing out! And obviously they already had troubles in the marriage before this happened. It does stink though that his wife had to find out in such a publicly humiliating way.

What stands out about these pictures is that he won't hold her hand and they changed the camera angle to hide BG's face during the kiss.

I commented on how the MARRIED MAN hardly ever looks interested in SM when he kisses her because his body is always stiff/leaning away from hers, he bends his neck like he is trying to keep as much distance between them as possible, his hands are always somewhere else instead of touching her, and he looks bored-like he is doing a household chore. And today we have pictures of them kissing with some improvements. For one, SM is holding on to him to reduce the amount of distance between them and they changed the angle so that we see very little of BG face/body to avoid his "HURRY UP AND TAKE THE **** PICTURE" look. It's very subtle, but even something like this just goes to show how they are putting on an act. I wouldn't be surprised if the next PDA photos show them holding hands and they made the MARRIED MAN practice on looking more interested. Seriously, if SM fell into a hole, he wouldn't even notice that she was gone.

They had problems in their marriage, according to whom? Sources? Those sources wouldn't happen to be SM and her mother and step-mother would it? The "separation, marriage was over, they were having problems before I got there" were created by SM and her PR team (mother/step-mother) AFTER SM leaked those "embarassing" photos and saw that no one was impressed by her antics with a MARRIED MAN. SM and her mothers dragged RG's marriage through the mud to justify SM behavior with her HUSBAND.

According to SM defenders, BG was having problems in his marriage and was pretending to "be happy", so by that same logic he is also having problems with SM and only pretending to "be happy". According to SM defenders, BG faked poses with a woman he was married to for 8 years, so he can definately be faking these poses with SM right now.

Leave SM alone? How about telling SM to leave RG and her kids alone?

Of course there must have been problem in his marriage or else he never would be with another woman. Sometimes we've to follow our heart. The kids are happier if they parents are happy and I think his wife is trying to hold on to the picture of a perfect marriage so the kids later can't blame her. What I can't understand is why you blame it all on Sienna? Like some said it takes two to tango.

MORGANA It's not the affair most people complain about but the fact that they have had no compassion and flaunted the affair in front of his wife and children, if you are unhappy in your relationship separate and get your children through the split and then bring another person into your life. And by the way miller will not let this affair go so easily she has too much to loose. Will look a bit stupid if it all went belly up so soon.

I don't really get it. Surely dating this guy, [if you ever were to be with him longterm] you'd have to be concerned he might do the same to you?

so for me, it would be a massive turn off that he could even THINK about doing that to his wife. Who he's still legally bound to.

I don't think SM is doing herself any favours with this situation

amen to that macchiato. Guys like this that can leave his wife and small children for the next young thing normally has no qualms in doing the same. (Jude Law). You'd think she'd learn her from her 1st lesson. Unfortunately there are lots of women out there who have no qualms in being the other woman.

Wow - 4 WHOLE months! I realize Getty's (old money) rich and topping him is going to be hard but I'm sure SM's already on the look-out for someone better and willing to leave his family for her.

MORGANA:
I was raised to respect other people's relationships and to take accountability for my actions, so I find both the AFFAIR and the manner in which they are flaunting it disturbing.

First off, BG is 100% responsible for his part in the AFFAIR because he shouldn't have stepped outside his marriage. Secondly, SM is 100 % responsible for her part in the AFFAIR because she had no right disrespecting another woman's marriage by sleeping with her HUSBAND, shamelessly flaunting it, and then having the audacity to play the victim and spread lies about RG marriage. I hope you remember that it takes two to tango the next time a SM defender claims that SM is innocent and then deflects from SM bad behavior by blaming RG/marriage(ie-BG wasn't happy) or putting the FULL BLAME on the MAN.

We may not be able to control OUR EMOTIONS, but we can most certainly control OUR ACTIONS. We have the right to follow our hearts, but we do not have the right to intentionally hurt people in the process. Why do SM defenders think that no one is being hurt by this AFFAIR? I get it, out of sight out of mind, right? So if you don't see RG/kids pain/suffering, then it must not exist. And sleeping with a MARRIED MAN and flaunting it is not following your heart, it's stupid, selfish, irresponsible, and inconsiderate.

You claim that RG is trying to hold on to the "perfect marriage" image, but I think that you are mistaken. It's SM that is trying to paint the imagine that BG had an "imperfect marriage" to justify her behavior with him. If people think that BG had a "bad marriage", then SM feels that she and BG are not doing anything wrong by HAVING THIS AFFAIR and flaunting it. BTW, it is common for marriages to through rough times and it doesn't mean that IT IS OVER OR THAT ONE OF THE PEOPLE ARE UNHAPPY. You must have missed that report that stated that people don't cheat because they are UNHAPPY, they cheat because they are selfish, immature, insecure, and because the person they are cheating with encourages the AFFAIR and doesn't say "NO".

If BG is "following his heart" like you claim, then why won't he get a DIVORCE? I don't buy the excuse that he is staying married to protect his inheritance or prevent his wife from exposing his secrets. If he loves SM, then he would file the divorce and arrange for his wife/kids to receive the necessary funds from his job/family. Since SM is financially supporting him and filing lawsuits just to keep him comfortable, he won't even have to worry about his inheritance. I will believe that BG is in love with SM when he files for a divorce and doesn't create any problems for his wife. He won't divorce because he is making himself unavailble to SM, he can't marry her if he is still married. That doesn't sound like a man "in love". BTW, BG looks absolutely bored and uninterested in these photos with SM. So much so, that if you photo-shopped SM out of those pictures that you would get the impression that he is taking a walk by himself (and looking at something on the ground instead of kissing her).

What becomes more and more apparant with each and every staged photo-op/PR leak is that SM has histrionic personality disorder and BG is a typical passive aggressive male. People with HPD are very insecure, attention seekers, display inappropriate sexual behavior and manner of dress, have to constantly be reassured and are always looking for approval, blames others for their failures, have to be the center of attention, engages in risky behaviors, are easily bored, think that their relationships are more intimate than what they really are, have the need for instant gratification, and rarely have any same-sex friendships. If this sounds familiar, then it should because SM has displayed all of these symptoms in her staged photo-ops and PR leaks.

I will admit that I thought it was odd that RG didn't file the divorce, but after these recent PR stunts I understand why she hasn't filed. She is ****if she files the divorce and ***if she doesn't file the divorce. If RG/kids are quietly living their lives and BG is going through this much trouble to humilate them, then imagine what he would do to them if she actually filed the divorce. I get the impression that BG would drag her and those kids through the mud, worse than what he is doing now, if she filed that divorce.

Almost makes me not wanna wear my Balenciaga scarf that he's wearing. Almost.

They seem so proud of the fact that they are gross.

oh Sienna! she gets the blood flowing for many readers

Myst, Jude didn't leave his wife for Sienna...Jude and Sadie's divorce had already been filed and was granted shortly after they started filming Alfie (where Jude and Sienna met)...it's a fairly popular misconception, though.

But why just be worried for Sienna about Getty's intentions? After all, Sienna dumped her live-in boyfriend (which, according to him, took him by surprise) to live with Jude, and she dumped Rhys for Getty, so she's capable of giving it, too. But really, I don't care if they dump each other tomorrow. Conversely, I don't care if they live happily ever after. I just wish they'd go away.

dudes....chillax. Don't fight on about these ho bags, they're not worth it.

Hey c2Robin, in my mind you can type REALLY fast, I just see you at your computer pounding away on the keyboards, that whole post must have taken you all of 20 seconds.

trust me Sherylynne, I'm the last person worried about Sienna. What I meant by Jude was she knows what's it's like to be cheated on, why put yourself in the position to hurt someone else. However that chick has no qualms period cause she slept with Hayden Christian.. whatever his name is while he had a girlfriend, when they shot that movie together too. His girlfriend found out the same way everyone else did. I'm saying she has a history of doing this and men like Getty will continue to use her to get their own.

If he really loved her, he'd have filed for divorce by now. His wife called him out on it, said if he wants a divorce HE needs to file and he has yet to even file a LEGAL separation from her, while he's still going around with Sienna. He doesn't respect her. How can he when she doesn't respect herself?

Yeah, you're right, Myst, she doesn't seem bothered by who gets hurt in the fallout of her actions. I think what gets me most about her screwing around with other people's men is that she behaved like the wounded little lamb victim after Jude did wrong*, claiming she had "lost her innocence"** and now it's so obvious that that just turned out to be a windfall opportunity for her to gain the attention she desired more than anything. People truly hurt by love don't have the energy to behave the way she did.

*(yes, he was a bad boy, he should have just broke up with her, period...but at least he apologized...and he wasn't even her husband...and his affair didn't produce naked pictures on yachts and all-but-intercourse sex on the beach)

**(cough cough...she brought boys home to have sex, with her mom's blessing, as a teenager...which was their choice to live that way and their business, but come on, don't think there's much innocence left after that)

I sure hope you all was as hard when Julia Roberts and Angelina Jolie got together with married men or is it just Sienna that makes you got through the roof? Why are you all blaming HER?

TODAW: Why are you worried about how long it takes me to type? If this is the SM board, then why are you focused on me? That's right, IT'S A DEFLECTION.

MORGANA:
Since this is the SM board, why would we be talking about AJ or JR? Like I said, NO WOMAN HAS THE RIGHT TO DISRESPECT ANOTHER WOMAN'S MARRIAGE. There are victims of double standards; however, SM IS NOT ONE OF THEM. People are going on about SM being a victim of double standards(ie-or as you stated, "why are we blaming SM"), not even realizing that they are committing a double standard everytime they argue that SM is "innocent" and should be absolved of the AFFAIR. SM is EQUALLY responsible for the AFFAIR because she didn't say "NO" and shamelessly flaunted the AFFAIR. And instead of being an adult and taking responsibility for her actions, what did she do? She tried to paint the picture that BG had an "imperfect" marriage to justify her actions with him and make it seem like she was just rescuing him from his "bad wife and marriage". She played the victim card, blamed the papz, staged "personal attacks" to drun up sympathy, keeps "romanticizing" the AFFAIR, and is now trying to convince the public that they are "going strong despite all the criticism" because they are kissing on a public street and meet up from time to time to spend "quality time" together.

The truth of the matter is, if BG was "in love" or intended on having a longterm relationship with SM he would have gotten a divorce by now. So, no amount of staged photos/PR leaks of them kissing or engaging in any PDA is going to change that fact. These staged photos of her with the NOT YET DIVORCED/LEGALLY SEPARATED MARRIED MAN are only making her look desperate and pathetic. If BG was "putting on a show" with his wife like SM defenders claim, then this is most certainly true with his AFFAIR with SM. Seriously, check out his body language in these photos. No man that loves you is going to put his hands in his pockets while he is kissing you (BTW, you will notice that everytime he kisses SM he never looks interested-body is stiff, hands are always somewhere else, and looks like he would rather be somewhere else). And don't use it was cold because SM isn't even wearing any gloves.

Why do SM defenders always try to delfect from SM bad behavior by bringing up AJ and JR? Don't you realize that by bringing them up you are only demonstrating how SM behavior with BG is even more horrendous? JR and AJ are no angels, but at least they had the decency to not be filmed allowing the MARRIED MAN to suck/grab their breasts, didn't leak reports about living in the MARRIED MAN's family home, didn't have their mothers/step-mother/ex-boyfriends wife publicly condone the AFFAIR, didn't leak stories about wanting to MARRY the MARRIED MAN and have his kids, didn't stage "personal attacks" to drum up sympathy, didn't beg the MARRIED MAN's wife to "tell the truth", and didn't sue certain media outlets to draw even more attention to the affair. I also recall that these ladies at least laid low and didn't come out of hiding every so often to remind everyone that they "won". What am I saying, you only believe "sources"(ie-SM, mother, step-mother) that depict RG and her marriage as "imperfect".

I'm sorry but people need to stop being so judgemental. No one knows the full facts to this story but the direct people involved. Divorce and seperation is a difficult decision to make and it's not one that can be made overnight. What I mean by that, is that him & his wife could have been having problems for a long time. Yes, he obviously should have filed by now. Yes, it's wrong that him and sienna are flaunting it. But to make any assumptions beyond that when we don't know these people from a hole in a wall except what the media pumps out to sell magazines or make tv numbers is just wrong. JMHO!

SIMPLY ME how long could they have had problems they have a baby which was only 6 month old when they started the affair or at least when we all found out, if you check back on interviews and remarks you might get a better picture , not what the media pumps out i agree is not always the full story remarks made by both are more accurate.

What baffles me about this whole ordeal is that:

1) Peolpe keep ADVOCATING NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS. They have made every excuse under the sun for SM. I've read that it's not SM fault because she is a single woman/not married/didn't take vows, she can't help who she fell for, they are in love, she is naive and has fallen for BG's charm, BG was unhappy, or the usual "we don't know the whole story". Now that's being judgemental, ignoring/diminishing SM role in the AFFAIR while glorifying her AFFAIR with a MARRIED MAN.

2) The media is assisting BG and SM in the humilation of a mother and her 4 kids everytime they suggest that SM hasn't done anything wrong and go so far as to write that this AFFAIR is "romantic" or "passionate". Now that's being judgemental because they are helping to facilitate the "SM is the VICTIM" image and glorify the AFFAIR. So everytime teens read something like this they will think that they have the right to interefere in ANOTHER WOMAN's MARRIAGE because some site said that it was "romantic" and that they can hide behind excuses and blame others instead of taking responsibility for their actions. But of course, you don't find that judgemental do you?

3) GETTING A DIVORCE IS A MUCH HARDER DECISION TO MAKE THAN THE DECISON TO CHEAT/PUBLICLY HUMILATE YOUR WIFE/KIDS? BG didn't have any difficulties making the decision to have a VERY PUBLIC AFFAIR with SM and publicly humilate his wife/kids, so I seriously doubt that he is having any difficulties deciding to a get divorce. If he hasn't filed for a divorce by now it is because he doesn't love SM/had no intentions of having a longterm relationship with her(anything over 2 years) and that he is only continuing this AFFAIR to spite his wife for "humilating him" by not taking him back.

As you can see, I don't buy the excuse that he won't divorce because he is trying to protect his assets or he is struggling with the decision to "leave his family for SM" and BG isn't worried about his inheritance because SM is financially supporting him and filing lawsuits to keep him comfortable.

4)SM AFFAIR with BG is about his FAMILY NAME. She wants to be able to say "I slept with a GETTY", because in her mind GETTY ranks right up there with the KENNEDYs. As long as media outlets continue to glorify her AFFAIR with BG, she will continue with these staged photo-ops and PR stories. If the media outlets stopped refering to this paring as "romantic" how long do you think SM will stay latched onto GETTY?

5) You don't find it judgemental that SM is doing everything in her power to downplay BG's marriage? It's SM that is trying to paint the picture that BG had an "imperfect marriage" because this would mean that she is justified in her actions with another woman's husband. She is making her AFFAIR with BG out be something it most certainly is not. Since BG is still married he is telling the world LOUD AND CLEAR that SM is just a "friend with benefits" who gives him gifts/money and takes him on vacations. And check out his body language. Notice that he is only "all over SM" when he is either drunk or she is naked/topless/semi-nude/giving him gifts/money. He is willing to "play" with SM, but he won't make any commitments to her. She can keep up with these staged photo-ops if she wants, but they are just confirming what everyone expected. I will believe that BG is "in love" with SM when he does what is right for his family.

c2robin
Everyone else is wrong but you've all the facts on both sides?

MORGANA, if you can not understand why people don't condone sleeping with another woman's husband and then shamelesly flaunting it, then it is because you are ignoring SM behavior and are just looking at the things that keep your fantasy of SM intact. This is an internet site and just because they are glorifying the AFAIR, doesn't mean that the rest of the world is. Here's some "food for thought".

1) Why do SM defenders always advocate not taking responsibility for one's actions?

2) Why do SM defenders always talk about double standards and then commit one when they ignore/diminish SM role in the AFFAIR and blame RG marriage or put the FULL blame on BG?

3) Why do SM defenders keep going on about how "romantic" this AFFAIR is when 5 people are being humilated?

4) Why does SM keep complaining about how the papz are being "unfair" to her when she is sleeping with another woman's HUSBAND, flaunting it via staged photo-ops/PR stories, and spreading lies about RG and her marriage.

5) Why do SM defenders only believe "sources"(SM, step-mother, and mother) that depict RG's marriage as "imperfect" or RG as a villian?

6)Why do SM defenders have one rule for SM and another set of rules for others? For instance, you want to say that BG was appearing with his wife in May even though they were separated to be "civil", but when someone applies this same logic to his AFFAIR with SM all of a sudden "NO ONE KNOWS THE FULL STORY"?

7) Why do SM defenders always deflect from the issue by bringing up other women that have AFFAIRS? Don't they realize that when you compare SM behavior to these other women, it only demonstrates how bad her behavior is as opposed to the others.

Why do SM defenders ignore the fact that SM could have AVOIDED this AFFAIR by sayin "NO"?

9) If SM is so distressed by the papz, why does she keep tipping them off so that they can capture her PR stunts with the MARRIED MAN and leaking stories about her adventures with him to draw attention to themselves?

10) Why does SM keep reminding everyone that JL cheated on her, isn't that hypocritical considering the fact that she is standing on a PUBLIC street kissing another woman's HUSBAND? Why do SM defenders get on others for juding "poor little helpless SM" and then totally ignore what SM and her mothers said about JL nanny?

11) When all else fails and they can not come up with anything valid to support SM, why do SM defenders always resort to insults or name calling?

12) Why won't SM lay low? She keeps flaunting this AFFAIR like she is trying to make the HOT COUPLES TOP TEN LIST and all because she is "in love" with BG's FAMILY NAME.

13) Why do the media outlets contribute to the humilation of RG and her kids by suggesting that SM is a "VICTIM" or glorify this AFFAIR? What is "romantic" about humilating a mother and her kids? What is "romantic" about sleeping/kissing/messing around on a boat with another woman's husband or competing with a mother and her 4 kids for a man? Do they also have the out sight out of mind mentality? As long as they don't see RG/kids suffering do they think that it doesn't exist?

14) If BG is scum and SM is publicly engaging in acts of PDA, then what does that tell you about SM character? SM defenders only seem to want to blame BG, but they fail to realize that a woman who respects herself and other woman would never stand for his behavior.

c2robin - If he had an affair, there were problems in their marriage. Someone who is truly happy in their marriage, does NOT have an affair. And, just because you have a baby, doesn't mean everything in the relationship is good either.

simply me,
since JL cheated on SM, then by your logic they were HAVING PROBLEMS? Since JL was unhappy with SM(because by your own admission happy men don't cheat), he and the nanny were justified in having the AFFAIR? So SM should just stop all this nonsense about how she was betrayed by JL, right?

People cheat because they are selfish, immature, and irresponsible, and not because they are "unhappy". This concept goes back to the whole taking responsibility for your actions and being accountable. Saying someone cheated because they were "unhappy" is the EASY WAY OUT because instead of acknowledging their bad behavior, it is just another means to shift the blame away from themselves and onto someone else.

Like I stated before, SM defenders have one rule for Sm and another set of rules for everyone else. Since BG had an AFFAIR with SM while he was still married, you have come to the conclusion that he was unhappy with his wife. So using your logic, I can conclude that the opposite of this statement is true as well. Since BG is sleeping/appearing in public with his mistress while still married to his WIFE, that means that BG won't get a divorce because he is "unhappy" with SM? Because a "happy" man would cut all ties with his wife so he can start anew with his new "love"? And just because he went on a trip to Italy with SM or stood on a street kissing her, that doesn't mean that everything in their AFFAIR is good. And saying that he won't get a divorce because he wants to protect his assets or that getting a divorce is a difficult decision for him are just EXCUSES to cover up the fact that he won't get a divorce. Oh, maybe BG is waiting for SM settlement money from her latest "harassment" lawsuit?