Well whatever she looks like I bet she is just adorable. Nice to know that parenthood is going so well for them.

ash wednesday rose pillow baby kidman urban is to holy to show her face, nicole looks horrid, love keiths music

LOL@ ash wednesday

hmm maybe im seeing things but is nicole going bald? weird

What the heck does Ash Wednesday mean?

so paparraci didn't listen when they asked to leave them alone?

Can't wait to see her face now!

The baby looks pretty big for a one month old in the pic of keith holding her. Maybe it's just the angle and the blankets but she looks big.

her name is sunday right so i renamed her wednesday another day in the week and then in the catholic religion there is ash wednesday so then put ash wednesday and rose being her middle name pillow baby meaning she was never pregnant and was carrying a pillow kidman her mothers last name urban her fathers last name, jesus christ have to explain everything

Lol, whatever. I could care less about Nicole Kidman and her baby since she kicked Isabella and Connor to the curb.

Oh...how juvenile. Thanks for the explanation though. I actually got the rest of it...I was just wondering about the Ash Wednesday part...thinking it had more meaning or some sort of extremely clever insight to your original diatribe, since you used something I know to be a religious day...but no. Nothing like that...just really juvenile.

maybe juvenile but who the hell cares this is a GOSSIP SITE when all things go unless personally attacking a poster why do people take sh*t so personal over something and someone they know nothing about other than whats on gossip sites or out of their mouth

someone's dlisted persona is showing

nicole is going bald

i don't think nicole kicked conner and isabella to the curb. i think tommy boy turned them against her with all that sickentology crapola

I feel so bad for them. They made an effort to ask the paparazzi to stop, they are trying to do what they feel is right for them and the baby and no one is respecting that. Not even me by supporting it by clicking on the post and commenting. I just think that if someone asks them to back off- which I guess technically they aren't in their face, but still- people should listen. I'm sure it's hard to enjoy a new baby when constantly dealing with that. Other celebs want it and love it, so we should just stick with that. They are trying to be low-key, let them be.

And you'd think people would learn by now, a baby looks like a baby, not all that interesting for the first few months. Even Brad and Angelina's babies were pretty generic and could've belonged to anyone, so why the rush. Give it time and one of these days we'll see a cute smiley cherubic face with two glowing parents.

Nicole looks GHASTLY in this photos...

Cool, is Nicole's hair like early days again?

And it's nice to see a non-baby-cover celebrity parent.

i actually wish they would have sold the pics and gave the money to charity. Oh well.

And yeah she looks horrid. But seriously you dont' see tom with connor and... forgot the daughters name. (or at least pics) and now you get this one. Um.. how come her and tom couldnt' have a baby together. and now they both all of a sudden get married and have kids with other people?? where the hell are their two kids???

I didn't take it personal. However it was a juvenile comment. You meant it to be juvenile, right? You didn't think it was clever or insightful or funny did you? Its like Bob Saget's stand up...its funny to some, you get a few cheap laughs, but its like stuff you say in high school.

nicole's hair is getting really thin.

i want proof that ALL this celebrity baby "charity" money goes to real charities. i'm not buying it.

Who are you, that the celebrities need to provide you with proof of charitable giving? If you don't believe it, you don't believe it. End of story. Now moving on...

Nicole's and Tom's adopted daughter is Isabella.

who are YOU????

I think Nicole has all the class and sense to say that it's a tiny little thing, not a doll.
I admire that.

dancingnancy, I agree about the Scientology thing. He had them call Katie Holmes mom, but never insisted he call their adopted mother mom? Okay, that's messed up! She said she tried with them, but they never took a liking to her. That's really not her fault.

Also, I'm really proud of her for not selling her daughter's pictures. I doubt she would have made more than Jessica Alba or Matthew M, but at least she's starting on the right foot by shielding her baby from the cameras.

they call their adopted mother**

nicole DID say she's like a doll

it amazes me that jessica miserabla and matt m got all that money for their babies pics. personally, i couldn't care less

I'll tell you who I'm not...I'm not the one touting I could "care less", but then profess a WANT for proof of charity. That's who I AM NOT. So again, who are YOU, that you just need so much proof!?!

The baby looks a little big for one month old.

This is one Hollywood baby I couldn't care less about. I do worry about the kids Nicole adopted with Tom though now that both of there parents have started biological families with new partners. I wonder if Connor and Isabelle see their parents at all anymore.

No, no, no, Dancing Nancy. I was referring to the following paragraph:

>>
“She’s tiny. She’s not a doll. She’s a like a real little thing. Just [don’t photograph] right in her face or in our faces because it’s scary for her. She’s tiny, a tiny little thing,” Nicole pleaded.

sorry, teach. nicole is absolutely correct. no one should shove a camera in a baby's face.

The whole story about Nicole not having her two older children never calling her ''mom'' is blown otu of proportion. The media twisted this quote from this interview:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r980FtiMSAU

She just said that her kids never called ''mom'' just mommy and sometimes Nicole.

But it was more story-worthy to just say they just call her Nicole and compare it to Katie's quote about them calling her mom.

I've never really been a fan of Nicole but I'm so happy that she has the family she's wanted and is free from that lunatic.

What the freak? Sometimes two people cannot combine to make a baby and then they get with someone else and it works out just fine. Just the way life is, so whoever was going off about why her and Tom couldn't have kids together, she did get pregnant and miscarried. Thank god they didn't have a kid because that would just be one more kid involved in the divorce. Can people not be happy for someone? Tom & Katie have brainwashed the kids into Scientology so Katie is "Mom" now. Isn't it obvious?

No problem Dancing Nancy.
The later half of my post was truncated.
I meant to say that Nicole doesn't regard her baby as a doll, implying that the baby is not just an object to look at and photographed.
I think the remark makes lots of sense. And I do hope they protect the baby from the strangers' cameras.

Stop with the f*&%king babies! God...so over the babies...EW they are sticky, they fart, and cry and smell. EW!

i like puppies better than babies.

Yeah, babies farts, smells and cries. They are like real people right?

I still say: children should call their adopted parents mom/mommy and dad/daddy, and also have the option of calling their new mother mom or by her first name. As their parent, Tom should have taught them the difference between the mother that helped raise them, and the new mother that just came into their lives. It seems disrespectful to Nicole that they sometimes call her by her name. I also read in an interview that it hurts her (The interview where she opened up about her miscarriages.), straight from her mouth.

I agree, Silverlining. It's disheartening to read people saying that Nicole doesn't love her adopted children because they aren't photographed together 24/7 or because she now has a biological child as well. I think that Scientology is the reason she and Tom broke up and it's the reason she can't be with her children. Anyone who says that she's not with them by choice is out of their mind. That's a really harsh assumption to make about someone.