Wow- she looks majorly photoshopped but stunning! Can't wait for this movie.

Sorry but something is very "off" about that photo. Something about her face looks very un-Gwyneth-Paltrow-like

Agree. Photoshop much?

Wow! I didn't even know who it was. Let alone if it's really anyone..

Her head's too big for her body, at least, the way she looks on the pic it seems that way

you'd think that, by now, if the magazine industry wanted to photoshop a cover, they would do it a little more subtly rather than in the SUPER OBVIOUS kind of way.

Someone really needs to fire all of the Photoshop artists over at Vogue. Lately all their covers seem to feature space aliens impersonating famous actresses.

Every cover is altered in some capacity. It seems that the editors have lost their perspective,though, when it comes to beauty that real women want to emulate. Sure, we like the eyes and teeth whitened, and few of the wrinkles gone, but we aren't fooled when they try to pass off GP as a 20-something-robotic Blake Lively. It's upsetting that they think we find this attractive. Trouble is, though, many of the people in charge of this tend to look this way in real life, so where is their perspective?

Wonder who made the gown... Marchesa?
Yes lots of photoshopping... her complexion is a little bit too translucent... though they do usually go for an ethereal look with Gweneth Paltrow

True anothermeowmix- I think if the person starts to not look like themdelves in the picture then it's too much photoshop.

That is one weird looking cover.

Her head looks detached from the rest of her body.

whoaa. Way too photoshopped.

She looks like a bobble head doll. What a terrible cover.

Definitely photoshopped. She looks like an alien.

ROFL Jude C! That just made my evening.

I think it's Gwyn's hair that makes her look so weird. And the over photoshopping they did on her. She doesn't NEED photoshop lol.

What on earth is that? If they feel the need to photoshop her to the point of no return, I can only imagine what they must think of us "normal" gals!

Did she really get a cover for Iron Man? lol she's so passed it.

Anyone can be made beautiful when you are photoshopped.

She looks frozen in time!! And that head is not part of that body!

What is she leaning on? It looks like one of those weird Japanese robots who assist elderly people.

She's too photoshopped. Why? She's already beautiful!

agreed. fug. she looks terrible

I can't stand it, she's photoshopped to death!

Do you know who she reminds me of here? Juliette from LOST!!

She looks like a Barbie doll

Oh please. She wants it both ways. She's photographed by the paps with Madonna and has to make a spectacle of herself by keeping her head down while everyone else is just ignoring them, but here she is on the cover of Vogue. If she wants her anonymity back that badly, then she needs to get lost and avoid all cameras, not just the paps'. And I can't believe I said that because I hate what the paparazzi do to a lot of celebrities, but it's not like she's being covered 24/7 like today's "it" girls.

FaeMuse: She is leaning on Iron Man's head (Can't believe he's on the cover of Vogue /fangirl freakout)

I thought she was a mannequin when I first glanced at the photo.

Wow, great cover!

She looks way too photoshopped here. And is it just met or does anyone else find it strange she's going to be in an action blockbuster movie? It doesn't seem like her normal style, curious to see how it's going to work out.

hmmm..the cover is um..dont know..cant put my finger on it.

I agree - WAY too much Photoshop going on here!

Who the hell is that? Its not Gwyneth thats for sure!

Wow, she looks creepy!

I think she really looks like her Mom in this pic....

FISHSTICKS! whatev, This is why i dont subscribe to ANY magazines anymore because a) the cover price is too high because they have to hire all these photoshop experts from outerspace and b)I dont know what is real anymore in regards to anyones body or features.

Weird cover. I can't believe they didn't get a better shot for the cover than this one.

Sorry cherryice, I couldn't possibly agree with you less. Of course she's going to do magazine covers and go to events trying to promote her newest project; it's part of the job. However, getting her picture taken in her workout gear while walking to the gym is not. It can be said that they have to expect the photogs, but that doesn't mean they have to like or encourage it. I know I certainly wouldn't. Let's not forget that celebrities being hounded the way they are now hasn't always been the norm.

BTW, you have no idea how much she or anyone else is hounded on any given day. Just because we see pictures sporadically doesn't mean they aren't ALWAYS lurking around following these people in their day-to-day lives. We just see the pictures people choose to publish.

Someone in the art department at Vogue needs to be slapped around a little. I know perfectly well that Photoshop is a necessary evil for cover photographs, but this doesn't even look like Gwyneth Paltrow any more. They went seriously overboard with the digital manipulation!

so...she is not pregnant....just rumours

Are they outsourcing photoshopping too now? =P

seriously, the photoshopping these days is getting out of control. these women do not need to be photoshopped in the first place, but if they are going to do it, then they should at least make it look like it could be real! it looks like they stuck gwen's body on a barbie doll.

ps. can't stand her

She looks a little stiff and posey. Tyra would not approve.

Amesabelle, I don't think they have to like it or encourage it either. I'm sure Madonna doesn't care to have them in her face all of the time, but she just puts on her sunglasses and keeps moving. She doesn't pose and grin, but goes about her business talking with her friends or whatever. Gwyneth has to act like she's always being put upon and simply can't stand this fame that she has. So, if you don't like the publicity and cameras, step out of the spotlight. She was doing very well for awhile there - practically dropped out of sight. Anyway, I think it's that husband of hers that has created this. I'm surprised the man hasn't bought a Popemobile and hired retired Secret Service agents to encircle him every time he leaves his house.

I suppose I'm letting some of my bias get in the way of my opinion here, because her arrogant attitude really turns me off and it comes through in these photographs. He's no prize either, IMO.

so boring. yawn!

god, freaky shoot. she should'nt accept such a manipoulations. those things are not so in line with her philosophye to be and appear always genuine. hypocrisie

Like a twenty-something robotic Blake Lively? Blake is hardly pretty (or talented enough) for this analogy. I mean, really, she isn't the epitome of youthful beauty au naturale: http://www.gossipgirlinsider.com/images/gallery/blake-lively-puppy.jpg

If I were famous, I would not want someone itching to catch me in a weird facial expression out on the street either. I can understand how someone can be an actress and not want to be a celebrity. Acting is a craft and not everyone who becomes an actor is interested in the celebrity factor.

While I am sure there is Photoshop involved, I often take photos where I look a bit unlike myself. I don't think her body looks Barbie dollish or that she looks overly bizarre. The overall tint of the photo and stiffness of the pose are what I find off putting.